Journal of Global Infectious Diseases

: 2019  |  Volume : 11  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 87--88

Anthrax-based epidemiological surveillance in Western Mexico

Salvador Valle-Reyes1, Tiburcio Lizama-Munguía2, Jorge A Salazar-Barragán2, José B Soto-Castellan2, Erika J Verján-Carrillo3, Francisco Espinoza-Gómez4, Perla A Rios-Flores5, Gabriel Ceja-Espíritu5, Iván Delgado-Enciso5, Uriel A López-Lemus1,  
1 Department of Health Sciences, Center for Biodefense and Global Infectious Diseases, Colima, Mexico
2 Department of Veterinary Public Health, Regional Animal Health Laboratory, Colima, Mexico
3 Department of Audiology, Mexican Social Security Institute, Colima, Mexico
4 Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Colima; Department of Internal Medicine, University Regional Hospital, Ministry of Health, Colima, Mexico
5 Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Colima, Colima, Mexico

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Uriel A López-Lemus
Rodolfo Chávez Carrillo S/N, Santa Teresa, 28078. Colima

How to cite this article:
Valle-Reyes S, Lizama-Munguía T, Salazar-Barragán JA, Soto-Castellan JB, Verján-Carrillo EJ, Espinoza-Gómez F, Rios-Flores PA, Ceja-Espíritu G, Delgado-Enciso I, López-Lemus UA. Anthrax-based epidemiological surveillance in Western Mexico.J Global Infect Dis 2019;11:87-88

How to cite this URL:
Valle-Reyes S, Lizama-Munguía T, Salazar-Barragán JA, Soto-Castellan JB, Verján-Carrillo EJ, Espinoza-Gómez F, Rios-Flores PA, Ceja-Espíritu G, Delgado-Enciso I, López-Lemus UA. Anthrax-based epidemiological surveillance in Western Mexico. J Global Infect Dis [serial online] 2019 [cited 2022 Sep 27 ];11:87-88
Available from:

Full Text


Anthrax is a zoonotic disease caused by Bacillus anthracis that mainly affects mammals, including humans. It has estimated an annual incidence of 20,000–100,000 cases worldwide[1] and has long been considered to be a Third World disease, due to the lack of effective health systems and scant investment in anthrax-based surveillance programs. Implementing effective surveillance strategies to prevent and minimize the risk for anthrax infection, propagation, and harm to the population must be considered in endemic countries.

We analyzed 47 dead livestock animals coming from animal slaughterhouses in Western Mexico during 2014–2016. At the time of the medical evaluation, they presented dyspnea, staggering, convulsive movements, trembling, and collapse. They were necropsied at the Regional Animal Health Laboratory following the considerations as previously described.[2],[3] A postmortem macroscopic examination for anthrax diagnosis was carried out by certified medical veterinary personnel, following the guidelines of the anthrax identification protocols of the Office International Epizootes.[4] No anthrax infection was observed, although the cause of death was associated to different diseases [Table 1]. Likewise, we analyzed 346 biological samples from patients with suspicious of gastrointestinal anthrax infection admitted to medical units of the Department of Health, Colima State, Mexico. Upon admission, symptoms had begun 3–5 earlier, with chills and fever (38°C–39.5°C; age range, 6–55 years old), painful swallowing, stomach pain, bloody diarrhea, vomiting, hoarseness, and neck glands. A polymerase chain reaction assay for the B. anthracis capsule production was carried out as previously described[5] with some modifications. None of the patients had anthrax infection.{Table 1}

Our results presented herein showed that no anthrax infection was observed. Although our findings suggest that there is no anthrax transmission, the emergence of livestock-associated diseases is a challenge that should not be ruled out [Table 1]. To date, there are two only anthrax reports in Mexico[6],[7] in which natural outbreaks and an intentional release through the postal service were observed. Both reports are real-life scenarios of the potential risk that we are exposed to; therefore, the implementation of anthrax-based surveillance programs should be considered national priority, especially due to the constant flow of people through global travel, immigration of animal species, importation of meat industry products, demographic growth, and increased urbanization that brings about greater human interaction with the environment. Interestingly, the anthrax surveillance is not considered in the National Epidemiologic Surveillance Programs (NOM-017-SSA2-2012; NOM-046-ZOO-1995) of the Mexican Departments of Human and Animal Health. Thus, it is possible that cases of anthrax may have gone unnoticed, due to the lack of surveillance strategies. An effective anthrax-based surveillance would strengthen timely response capacities in the face of emergent anthrax outbreaks and would identify the vulnerable areas that should be provided with preventive strategies for controlling emergent anthrax infections.

In conclusion, our observations suggest that there is no anthrax transmission in the studied population. Anthrax-based surveillance programs would help for understanding both the transmission dynamics and geographic distribution in our region as well as to determine the real panorama of anthrax transmission in human and animal populations in Mexico.


The authors would like to thank the National Council for Science and Technology (Federal Government, Mexico) for the financial assistance provided through CONACYT-FORDECyT grant # 2009/1-117535 and the medical and nursing personnel of the participating Mexican health institutions for their collaboration on this project. To the Regional Animal Health Laboratory for its support on this study.

Financial support and sponsorship

This work was supported by the National Council for Science and Technology of Mexico (CONACYT-FORDECyT grant # 2009/1-117535)

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.


1Chen WJ, Lai SJ, Yang Y, Liu K, Li XL, Yao HW, et al. Mapping the distribution of anthrax in mainland China, 2005-2013. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2016;10:e0004637.
2Love S. Post mortem sampling of the brain and other tissues in neurodegenerative disease. Histopathology 2004;44:309-17.
3Nietfeld JC. Field necropsy techniques and proper specimen submission for investigation of emerging infectious diseases of food animals. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 2010;26:1-13.
4Office International des Epizooties, (OIE). Anthrax. Ch. 2.1.1. In: Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals; 2016. Available from: 2.01.01_ANTHRAX.pdf. [Last updated on 2018 Oct].
5Rantakokko-Jalava K, Viljanen MK. Application of Bacillus anthracis PCR to simulated clinical samples. Clin Microbiol Infect 2003;9:1051-6.
6Fragoso Uribe R, Villicaña Fuentes H. Anthrax in 2 communities in Zacatecas, Mexico. Bol Oficina Sanit Panam 1984;97:526-33.
7Sarti E, Moreno-Galván M, Rodríguez-Angeles G, Viveros G, Flores-León R, Tapia-Conyer R, et al. Molecular characterization of anthrax in positive powders: A Mexican experience. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41:4909.